Stack Exchange network is made of 183 Q&A communities together with Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for builders to understand, share their knowledge, and Develop their careers. Visit Stack Exchange
is undoubtedly not excluding those cars that are both dented and need their oil changed. The main difference between or
Stack Exchange network is made of 183 Q&A communities such as Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for builders to discover, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Stop by Stack Exchange
Personally, more usually than not, I do not locate a double "that" to become distracting or leading to confusion in any way. Really the contrary: It's really a) properly self-explanatory and b) it definitely leads to less
I'd argue that it might very properly be proper, but if it makes you uncomfortable, it could also distract your readers. You've got most likely viewed the prevalent example:
three It seems odd to me that "used she to come listed here?" is marked as official (outdated-fashioned and awkward I concur with). The "used to" construction registers with me as currently being essentially casual. In a proper context I'd expect "did she formerly come right here?" or Several other wordier phrase. (AmE speaker)
, the two of which are pronounced with an /s/, in no way a /z/: /'yustə/. This pronunciation is part of The 2 idioms, and distinguishes the idioms from The straightforward sequence of words and phrases:
How is the Münchhausen trilemma not the biggest problem in meta-ethics and epistemology? more sizzling questions
The same behaviour could possibly materialize with the additional "that" appearing inside your sentence. So when it'd be right in principle, perhaps you could potentially reword your sentence this kind of that it results in being more readable to your audience.
Jill AndersonJill Anderson 1111 bronze badge one Howdy, Jill. Welcome for the crucible that is ELU. With your two examples, I would omit the commas; the comma is only licensed (and then contentiously) in between issue and verb for very major subjects. // And that i'd say the only difference between your examples is among register.
Why does the definition of newif utilize a edef with noexpand as an alternative to a def in plain TeX? more sizzling questions
The dialogue On this merchandise, As well as in all one other questions This can be talked over in -- repeatedly -- receives confused since individuals are thinking of idioms as being sequences of words and phrases, and they're not distinguishing sequences of words with two different idioms with completely different meanings and completely different grammars. These are, in effect, completely different words and phrases.
If I wanted to get completely unambiguous, I would say a little something like "need to be delivered just before ...". On the opposite hand, sometimes the ambiguity is irrelevant, despite which convention governed it, if a bottle of milk explained "Best file used by August tenth", you couldn't get me to drink it on that date. TL;DR: It really is ambiguous.
Both of those the phrases imply that an action has long been done frequently; they're not used check here to confer with actions that took place only when.